Guide for Authors
Types of Paper
Contact Details for Submission
BEFORE AUTHORS BEGIN
Ethics in Publishing
Declaration of Competing Interest
Role of the Funding Source
Preprint posting on SSRN
Use of Inclusive Language
Elsevier Researcher Academy
Article Processing Charges
Changes to Authorship
Submission as a New Paper
Requirements for Review Articles
Requirements for Research Articles
Materials and Methods
An International Open Access and Peer-Reviewed Journal.
Animal Nutrition encompasses the full gamut of animal nutritional sciences and reviews including, but not limited to, fundamental aspects of animal nutrition such as nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics and molecular and cell biology related to primarily to the nutrition of farm animals and aquatic species. More applied aspects of animal nutrition, such as the evaluation of novel ingredients, feed additives and feed safety will also be considered but it is expected that such studies will have a strong nutritional focus.
Types of Paper
Contributions falling into the following categories will be considered for publication: original research papers, reviews, and short communication.
Authors should select the appropriate article type from the list of options when making your submission. Authors contributing to special issues should ensure that they select the special issue article type from the list.
Contact Details for Submission
For queries concerning the submission process or journal procedures please visit the Elsevier Support Center. Authors can determine the status of their manuscript within the review procedure using Elsevier Editorial System.
BEFORE AUTHORS BEGIN
Ethics in Publishing
For information on Ethics in publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication see https://www.elsevier.com/publishingethics and https://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/ethics.
Does the research involve experimentation on animals? If so, please provide name of the ethical committee approving these experiments and confirm authors' compliance with all relevant ethical regulations.
Does the study include human subjects? If so, please provide name of the ethical committee approving these experiments, confirm authors' compliance with all relevant ethical regulations, and confirm that written consent has been obtained from all patients.
If the manuscript related to clinical study, please provide following pieces of information and state them in the manuscript: 1) date of IRB approval and the approval number, 2) status of informed consent (IC); [e.g. Was written IC required? Was the clinical study approved without IC? If so, the reason why?]
I confirm that I have obtained all consents required by applicable law for the publication of any personal details or images of patients, research subjects or other individuals that are used in the materials submitted to Elsevier. I have retained a written copy of all such consents and I agree to provide Elsevier with copies of the consents or evidence that such consents have been obtained if requested by Elsevier.
Clinical research must include IRB approval and patient consent forms.
Declaration of Competing Interest
All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential competing interests include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. More information.
Role of the Funding Source
Authors are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement then this should be stated.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis or as an electronic preprint, see Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication section of our ethics policy for more information), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. To verify originality, the article may be checked by the originality detection service CrossCheck.
Preprint posting on SSRN
In support of Open Science, this journal offers its authors a free preprint posting service. Preprints provide early registration and dissemination of your research, which facilitates early citations and collaboration.
During submission to Editorial Manager, you can choose to release your manuscript publicly as a preprint on the preprint server SSRN once it enters peer-review with the journal. Your choice will have no effect on the editorial process or outcome with the journal. Please note that the corresponding author is expected to seek approval from all co-authors before agreeing to release the manuscript publicly on SSRN.
You will be notified via email when your preprint is posted online and a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is assigned. Your preprint will remain globally available free to read whether the journal accepts or rejects your manuscript.
Please note: posted preprints for this journal will appear in a dedicated journal-branded First Look space on SSRN.
Use of Inclusive Language
Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities. Content should make no assumptions about the beliefs or commitments of any reader; contain nothing which might imply that one individual is superior to another on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health condition; and use inclusive language throughout. Authors should ensure that writing is free from bias, stereotypes, slang, reference to dominant culture and/or cultural assumptions. Animal Nutrition advises to seek gender neutrality by using plural nouns ("clinicians, patients/clients") as default/wherever possible to avoid using "he, she," or "he/she." Animal Nutrition recommends avoiding the use of descriptors that refer to personal attributes such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health condition unless they are relevant and valid. These guidelines are meant as a point of reference to help identify appropriate language but are by no means exhaustive or definitive.
Elsevier Researcher Academy
Researcher Academy is a free e-learning platform designed to support early and mid-career researchers throughout their research journey. The "Learn" environment at Researcher Academy offers several interactive modules, webinars, downloadable guides and resources to guide authors through the process of writing for research and going through peer review. Feel free to use these free resources to improve your submission and navigate the publication process with ease.
This journal operates a single blind review process. Papers deemed suitable are sent to independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The editors-in-chief are responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. For more information on the types of peer review, please visit: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/peer-review.
- All manuscripts are first reviewed by editorial office. Any manuscripts fail to meet the basic standard of the journal would be desk rejected for reasons like out of scope (e.g., pets, mice as experiment animals, pure feed studies without animal experiments), high similarities, poor presentation, etc. Selected manuscripts are assigned to editors-in-chief.
- Editors-in-chief would assign most manuscripts to associate editors and handle the rest themselves.
- For submissions by editors-in-chief or associate editors, only other journal editors could independently handle them.
- Authors or associate editors are not permitted to appoint a specifical handling editor for a manuscript. Researchers from the same research group or the same institution or organization of any of the authors are not to be selected as the handling editors or reviewers.
- Editors-in-chief or associate editors would evaluate the scientific content, desk reject or invite multiple peer reviewers.
- The handling editor can use Find Reviewers Using Scopus tool to invite reviewers, selecting reviewers basing on the relevance to the manuscript. The handling editor would use Web of Science or Scopus to check whether the papers published by the peer reviewer in the past are closely related to the manuscript sent for review.
- After at least 2 peer reviewers complete their reviews, the associate editors would suggest a decision and provide feedbacks based on review comments. Editors-in-chief make the final decision and provide review comments to the authors.
- After authors submit the revised manuscript, managing editors would check the revised manuscript and then assign it to editors-in-chief. The manuscript may be sent to peer reviewers for further review again. Editors-in-chief make the final decision.
This is an open access journal: all articles will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Permitted third party (re)use is defined by the following Creative Commons user licenses.
After the acceptance of a manuscript, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement'. Acceptance of the agreement will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version of this agreement.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)
Users are allowed to copy, to create extracts, abstracts and new works from the Article, to alter and revise the Article and to make commercial use of the Article (including reuse and/or resale of the Article by commercial entities), provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, indicates if changes were made and the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. (https://www.keaipublishing.com/en/journals/animal-nutrition/open-access-journal/)
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)
Users are allowed to copy and distribute the Article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes and further does not permit distribution of the Article if it is changed or edited in any way, and provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, and that the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
As an author, you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. More information
Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how authors can share their research published in Elsevier journals.
This journal is published quarterly continuously per year.
Ms. Luth W. Lyu & Ms. Hanna Wang
Address: Editorial office of Animal Nutrition, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China
Article Processing Charges
Open Access provides free and immediate online access to the scholarly literature for anyone in the world to read, distribute and reuse. Animal Nutrition offsets all the costs associated with our high-quality publishing service through article processing charges (APC): articles that are accepted for publication by our Editors-in-Chief following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to authors, institutions or funders. The current APC is US$1462 for each article accepted for publication plus VAT or local taxes where applicable.
All manuscripts must be written in clear and grammatically correct English. Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is acceptable, but not a mixture of these). Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing to eliminate possible grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific English may wish to use the English Language Editing service (https://webshop.elsevier.com/language-editing-services/language-editing/) available from Elsevier's Author Services or customer support site (https://service.elsevier.com).
Manuscripts should be complete, readable, and accurate. Common language issues should be avoided and typographical, grammatical and bibliographical errors before submission should be minimized by authors.
Authors whose native language is not English are encouraged to utilize free tools online to improve the syntax of manuscripts before submission or ask the colleagues who are skilled in English language for proofreading:
–Do a Microsoft Word `spell-check' and `grammar-check'
The Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine invites scientists from the global community to submit papers for consideration.
Animal Nutrition follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org) and authors should refer to COPE for guidance on authorship and publication ethics.
For more information on journal publication refer to http://www.keaipublishing.com/en/authors-and-editors/editorial-policies/.
Review of manuscripts
Upon submission to Animal Nutrition, a manuscript is assigned to an editor, who enlists reviewers to assist in the evaluation of the manuscript. The review process is confidential, which infers a bond of trust among the authors, editor, and reviewers. The editor is trustee of the manuscript until the review process is completed and ensures that the review process is fair, thorough, and confidential. Reviewers are asked not to share the contents of the manuscript with anyone, except that they may ask a colleague to assist with the review with approval of the editor. Communication with authors should only be through the editor. Reviewers should notify the editor of conflicts of interest that may compromise their ability to provide a fair and unbiased review. Moreover, they must recognize their responsibility in maintaining the confidential nature of the review. Authors should suggest names of appropriate reviewers when submitting the manuscript to streamline the review process and may list reviewers whom they consider unacceptable because of potential bias. These recommendations will be considered by the editor when assigning reviewers. Authors will generally be notified of acceptance, rejection, or need for revision within 3 months of receipt.
The acceptance of a paper implies that it has been reviewed and recommended by at least 2 peer reviewers. The Editor-in-Chief's decision is final.
If a manuscript is rejected, the corresponding author may initial a rebuttal. If the author believes a rejection decision was erroneous or biased, he/she may appeal the decision directly, in writing, to editors-in-chief or managing editors. The editor-in-chief will review the author's reasons, as well as all materials related to the manuscript, and will accept or deny the appeal. A rejected manuscript may be resubmitted for publication only if this course of action has been specifically recommended by the Editor-in-Chief.
Time limit of manuscript revision
A reviewed paper returned to authors for revision must be returned to the editor in time. If not, the paper may be treated as a new submission. Under unusual circumstances, editors may extend the revision deadline. If authors do not revise manuscripts and resubmit over 4 weeks from the date on which they are invited to revise, and has not obtained the delay of modification by the Editorial Office (subject to the major revision of the trial, agree to postpone the revision), they are deemed to have abandoned the amendment and the manuscript is treated as withdrawn.
Animal Nutrition recommends that authorship be based on the following criteria:
- Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
- Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND
- Final approval of the version to be published; AND
- Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Credit Author Statement
For transparency, Animal Nutrition requires authors to submit a document named as Credit Author Statement or Author Contributions. Please list the same authors as those on the title page and their roles, respectively, separated by a semicolon, in one paragraph.
Author contributions to the paper include the following relevant roles: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing. More details and an example
Changes to Authorship
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscripts and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission.
Before the manuscript has been accepted: Requests to add or remove an author, or to rearrange the author names, should be stated in the cover letter by the corresponding author and should include: (a) the reason the name should be added or removed, or the author names rearranged and (b) authors agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors, this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed. Requests that are not sent by the corresponding author will be forwarded to the corresponding author, who must follow the procedure as described above. Note that: processing of the manuscript is suspended until authorship has been agreed.
After the manuscript has been accepted: authorship generally cannot be changed after a manuscript has been accepted. Only in exceptional circumstances will the request for the addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors be considered.
The online submission system Editorial Managerguides authors stepwise through the process of entering the article details and uploading the files. The system converts the files to a single PDF file used in the peer-review process. Editable files (e.g., Word, LaTeX) are required to typeset the article for final publication. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for revision, is sent by e-mail.
Poorly written and/or presented manuscripts may be returned to authors by Editorial Office, prior to a review for scientific merit.
Please submit the names and institutional e-mail addresses of several potential reviewers. Reviewers must not be subject to a conflict of interest involving the author(s) or manuscript(s). The editors are not obligated to use any reviewer suggested by the author(s).
The following list will be useful during the final checking of a manuscript prior to submitting it to the journal for review.
- Authors should use the fewest files possible to facilitate the review and editing processes. The table and figure sections should be added at the end of the Reference section. Only when the manuscript Word file is too big (perhaps >15 MB) to upload to the system, authors should use separate files for figures.
- Consecutive line numbers and page numbers must be added to the manuscript from the title page to the table and figure sections.
- The manuscript file name is suggested to contain the word "Manuscript" and the name of the corresponding author, e.g., Manuscript S. Zhang et al.docx.
- All content must be complete. Authors must check and approve the system-generated PDF file, which is for peer review, at the last step of submission.
Ensure that the following items are correct:
- Maximum 2 corresponding authors.
- Maximum 3 authors who contribute equally.
- Maximum 2 funding sources per paper, with funding bodies and grant numbers provided.
- One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details: E-mail address and telephone number.
- This corresponding author is the sole contact for the Editorial process and responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs.
- The author, who is registered in the system as the corresponding author, must be consistent with the corresponding author on the title page.
All necessary parts have been included in the manuscript
- A mandatory Highlights file: Highlights are bullet points that convey the core findings of the paper. Authors may include up to 4 highlights. The length of each highlight cannot exceed 85 characters (including spaces).
- A graphical abstract (required after papers are accepted for publication).
- The experiment design and 4 elements (purpose, method, results, and conclusion) are clearly stated in the abstract in a research article.
- The basis (i.e., as-is, as-fed or DM basis) for dietary ingredients and chemical composition (analyzed not calculated) is specified, and feed intake and weight gain data are provided in a research article.
- All tables and figures, self-explanatory with the treatments explained and abbreviations defined.
- Do not use sub-tables such as Table 1A, Table 1B, etc.
- Each figure caption should be placed under the figure.
- Manuscript has been 'spell-checked' and 'grammar-checked'.
- Use either the American spelling or the British Spelling, but not the mixture.
- All references mentioned in the Reference list are cited in the text, and vice versa.
- Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the Web).
- The Conflict of Interest form is downloaded and filled even if the authors have nothing to declare.
- The Credit Author Statement file is provided.
- Responses to the comments of reviewers or referees are organized clearly. For example, state each review comment and reply to each one by one, or use 2 columns of which one states the comment and the other the response.
- Highlight the revised parts in the manuscript, or upload a clean manuscript file and another manuscript file with track changes.
Submission as a New Paper
- Only when authors are invited by the editor, authors can submit a manuscript that was rejected by the journal as a new submission. The cover letter should include the reason of submitting it as a new paper and the responses to peer reviewers' comments of the last round of review.
For the format and style, authors can refer to a recent issue of Animal Nutrition or the journal's Format Checklist file (download). A template for a research article or short communication (download) and a review article template (download) can be used. A common and standard abbreviation list (download) and an Endnote journal style (download) is available for Animal Nutrition.
The main text should be in single-column format and typed double-spaced. Times New Roman font at 12 points is used. Authors can align the text and table content to the left.
Use of word processing software
Please prepare manuscripts in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx format). It is important that the file be saved in the native format of the word processor used. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In particular, do not use the word processor's options to justify text or to hyphenate words. However, do use bold face, italics, subscripts, superscripts etc. The electronic text should be prepared in a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (see also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier). Note that source files of figures, tables and text graphics will be required. See also the section on Electronic artwork.
To avoid unnecessary errors, authors are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check' functions of your word processor.
If the LaTeX file is suitable, proofs will be produced without rekeying the text. The article should preferably be written using Elsevier's document class 'elsarticle', or alternatively any of the other recognized classes and formats supported in Elsevier's electronic submissions system, for further information visit our Support Center.
The Elsevier 'elsarticle' LaTeX style file package (including detailed instructions for LaTeX preparation) can be obtained from the Quickguide: https://www.elsevier.com/latex. It consists of the file: elsarticle.cls, complete user documentation for the class file, bibliographic style files in various styles, and template files for a quick start.
Requirements for Review Articles
Key instructions for a review article are as follows: 1) a review should critically evaluate the existing evidence using the most appropriate literature to comprehensively elucidate a topic, rather than pull together a catalogue of references; 2) it should present a clear picture of the state-of-the-art, highlighting what needs to be done in the future; and 3) it should have an appropriate length with a logical flow of text. The length of a review article excluding the Reference list should generally not exceed 8,000 words.
The structure of a review article contains the same sections as those of a research article, except it does not include sections of Materials and methods, Results, and Discussion. The requirements of sections of a review article are the same as those of a research article.
Requirements for Research Articles
A research article includes the following sections in this order:
- Title page
- Abstract and keywords
- Materials and methods
The sections of the Abstract, main text, Tables and Figures should be independent and self-explanatory. The main text refers to the sections from Introduction to Conclusion(s).
• Title: Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. The title should be concise and informative. The length of a paper title is preferably from 10 to 20 words. Avoid using abbreviations and formulae in a paper title where possible. Only widely accepted and well-established abbreviations can appear in the title. Only use generic names in article titles, and minimize the use of names of commercial products throughout the manuscript. Avoid using the words "effect", "impact", "influence" in the title where possible. If there is a (treatment) effect and it is of significance, this information should be made clear in the title.
• Author names and affiliations: Under the title, names of authors should be typed accurately. The given name is at the first and family name at the last. Use the initials for middle names if any. Present the authors' affiliation addresses (where the actual work was done) below the names. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-case superscript letter after the author's name and in front of the appropriate address. Provide the following information of each affiliation: 1) organization name, 2) city, 3) country.
• Corresponding author: Please use an asterisk (*) to indicate the corresponding author, who will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. Ensure that telephone number (with country and area code) is provided in addition to the e-mail address. Contact details must be kept up to date by the corresponding author. Maximum 2 corresponding authors (preferably only one corresponding author).
• Equal contributors: Maximum 3 authors who contributed equally to the work. Superscript numerals are used for such footnotes.
• Present/permanent address: If an author has moved since the work described in the article was done, or was visiting at the time, a present address (or permanent address) may be indicated as a footnote to that author's name using a superscript numeral. The address at which the author actually did the work must be retained as the main, affiliation address.
The Abstract is a one-paragraph short paper, which is preferably within 250 words and no more than approximately 350 words, i.e., it is about one double-spaced page. It usually begins with a clear statement of the objective, briefly states the principal methods including trial information, such as the number of animals, number of replicates, states main findings or results with statistical evidence, i.e., P-value, and ends with main implications or conclusions with no references cited. Use complete sentences and standard terms. Avoid using many abbreviations, the use of references, math formulae, symbols, and tables or figures in the Abstract. The Abstract must be able to stand alone.
Although a graphical abstract is optional, its use is encouraged as it draws more attention to the online article. The graphical abstract should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership. Graphical abstracts should be submitted as a separate file in the online submission system. Image size: Please provide an image with a minimum of 531 pixels × 1328 pixels (h × w) or proportionally more. The image should be readable at a size of 5 cm × 13 cm using a regular screen resolution of 96 dpi. Preferred file types: TIFF, EPS, PDF or MS Office files. Authors can view Example Graphical Abstracts on our information site.
Please provide 2 to 6 keywords or phrases in the order of importance for subject indexing.
Keywords should include important words from the title and should be singular, not plural terms, e.g., "pig" not "pigs". Avoid multiple concepts, e.g., "and", "of".
Be sparing with abbreviations, and only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible.
The first letters of keywords should be capitalized and keywords are separated by colons.
The Introduction section states the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background. It contains a brief justification for conducting the research, the hypotheses to be tested, and the objective(s). Extensive discussion of relevant literature should be included in Discussion, not in Introduction.
Materials and Methods
The institutional animal care and use committee statement should appear as the first item in this section, such as "2.1. Animal ethics statement", and authors should specify which publicly available animal care and use standards were followed.
This section must contain a clear description of how the experiment was conducted and how the data were analyzed. It should provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Diets, periods of experimental activities if appropriate, animals (breed, sex, age, body weight, and weighing conditions), surgical techniques, measurements, additives (do not just give product names or trademark names), and statistical models should be described clearly and fully.
Manufacturer information must be provided at the first mention of each proprietary product used in the research. The generic term for all drugs and chemicals should be used, unless the specific trade name of a drug is directly relevant to the discussion. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference; only relevant modifications should be described.
The Results section should be clear and concise, which explain or elaborate on data presented in the tables. Sufficient data, all with some index of variation attached, including significance level (i.e., P-value) should be presented to allow readers to interpret the results of the experiment.
One of the hallmarks for experimental evidence is repeatability. Care should be taken to ensure that experiments are adequately replicated. The results of experiments must be replicated, either by replicating treatments within experiments or by repeating experiments.
The terms significant and highly significant traditionally have been reserved for P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. Throughout the manuscript, the authors should either show P-values or use 4 levels of significance: P > 0.05, < 0.05, < 0.01 and < 0.001. For example, it is confusing to show P < 0.002, which is not a proper way to show P-values. When available, the observed significance level (e.g., P = 0.027) should be presented rather than merely P < 0.05 or P < 0.01.
The Discussion section should explore the significance of the results of the work. Discussion integrates the research findings with the body of previously published literature to provide the reader with a broad base on which to accept or reject the hypotheses tested. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
Results and discussion may be combined into a single section. If not, the Results section should not contain discussion of previously published work. Results and references to tables and figures already described in the Results section should not be repeated in the Discussion section.
The main finding or conclusions of the study may be summarized in a brief paragraph.
Authors may submit a short (maximum 100 words) biography of each author, along with a passport-type photograph accompanying the other figures, in an editable format (e.g., Word).
The Acknowledgments section should list sources of financial support with grant numbers, experiment station, and those individuals (not including editing service companies), who provided help during the research (e.g., providing language help, writing assistance or proof reading the article, etc.) in a succinct and appropriate manner but not as a long list of tributes and accolades.
All publications cited in the text should be presented in a list of references following the text of the manuscript. The manuscript should be carefully checked to ensure that the spelling of authors' names and dates are exactly the same in the text as in the reference list. The accuracy of the references is the responsibility of the author(s).
References published in other than the English language should be avoided, but are acceptable if they include an English language Abstract and the number of non-English language references cited are reasonable (in the view of the handling Editor) relative to the total number of references cited.
All references mentioned in the Reference list are cited in the text, and vice versa. Unpublished results and personal communications are not permitted in the reference list, but may be mentioned in the text.
As a minimum, the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. Any further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.), should also be given. Web references are included in the reference list, not listed separately.
References in a Special Issue
Please ensure that the words 'this issue' are added to any references in the list (and any citations in the text) to other articles in the same Special Issue.
Citations in text
All citations in the text should refer to:
- Single author: the author's name (without initials, unless there is ambiguity) and the year of publication;
- Two authors: both authors' names and the year of publication;
- Three or more authors: first author's name followed by 'et al.' and the year of publication.
Examples: 'as demonstrated (Allan, 1996a, 1996b, 1999; Allan and Jones, 1995). Kramer et al. (2000) have recently shown ...'
References should be arranged first alphabetically and then further sorted chronologically if necessary. More than one reference from the same author(s) in the same year must be identified by the letters 'a', 'b', 'c', etc., placed after the year of publication.
Reference to a journal publication:
Van der Geer J, Hanraads JAJ, Lupton RA. The art of writing a scientific article. J Sci Commun 2000;163:51–9.
Reference to an article within a journal by DOI:
Slifka MK, Whitton JL. Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. Dig J Mol Med 2000; https://doi.org/10.1007/s801090000086.
Reference to an article within a journal supplement:
Frumin AM, Nussbaum J, Esposito M. Functional asplenia: demonstration of splenic activity by bone marrow scan. Blood 1979;59 (Suppl 1):26–32.
Reference to an abstract:
Ferrara N, Houck K, Jakeman L. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Acq Immun Def Synd 1993;6:687 (Abstract).
Reference to a book:
Strunk Jr W, White EB. The elements of style. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1979.
Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
Mettam GR, Adams LB. How to prepare an electronic version of your article. In: Jones BS, Smith RZ, editors. Introduction to the electronic age. New York: E-Publishing Inc.; 1994. p. 281–304.
Reference to an online document:
Doe J. Title of subordinate document. In: The dictionary of substances and their effects. Royal Society of Chemistry. 1999. http://www.rsc.org/dose/title of subordinate document [accessed 15 Jan 1999].
Reference to an online database:
Healthwise Knowledgebase. US Pharmacopeia, Rockville. 1998. http://www.healthwise.org [accessed 21 Sept 1998].
Reference to a thesis:
Su J. Research of Fusarium toxins on anti-nutritional effect and its mechanism of pigs. [Doctor Degree Thesis Dissertation]. Sichuan Agricultural University; 2008.
Note shortened form for last page number. e.g.,51–9, and that for more than 6 authors the first 6 authors should be listed followed by 'et al.' For further details, authors are referred to "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals" (J Am Med Assoc 1997;277:927–34), see also http://www.nlm.nih.gov/tsd/serials/terms_cond.html
Journal abbreviations source
Journal names should be abbreviated according to
Index Medicus journal abbreviations: http://www.nlm.nih. gov/tsd/serials/lji.html;
List of title word abbreviations: http://www.issn.org/2-22661-LTWA-online.php;
CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service): http://www.cas.org/sent.html.
• "Table" is always capitalized and never abbreviated, such as Table 1.
• Please submit tables as editable text and not as images.
• Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article.
• The content of Tables can be typed single-spaced at 12 or smaller points. Align the data of the Table to the left.
• Put only one thing in each table cell, instead of several things.
• Limit the data field to the minimum needed for meaningful comparison within the accuracy of the methods. For example, results should not be presented to 5 digits when the instrument used only reads to 2 digits.
• Specify the basis (i.e., as-is, as-fed or dry matter basis) for dietary ingredient and chemical composition data listed in the main text or in tables. Similarly, specify the basis for tissue composition data (e.g., wet or dry basis).
• Units of measure for each variable must be indicated. Commas should be used to separate items or headings from the units of measure.
• Abbreviations used in Tables must be defined and consistent with those used in the text.
• Each footnote begins a new line. Use superscript numbers to indicate footnotes, and superscript letters to indicate statistical comparisons.
• Provide sufficient information so that Tables can be understood without excessive reference to the text.
• Present a horizontal Table on a horizontal page.
• "Figure" is abbreviated to "Fig.", such as Fig. 1.
• Ensure all Figures clear enough to be seen, especially the number and words (suggest the size to be no smaller than 8 points).
• Keep text in the Figures themselves to a minimum, and the font and size of numbers and words in all the Figures should be consistent.
• Provide sufficient information in captions so that Figures can be understood without excessive reference to the text.
• Animal Nutrition is a fully electronic journal. Authors are encouraged to use color to enhance figures. However, please only use color when absolutely necessary because many people are color blind.
• Present a horizontal Figure on a horizontal page.
Place the Figure caption under the Figure. Figure captions should comprise a brief title (not on the figure itself), a description of the figure, and abbreviation definitions. Explain each sub-figure after "(A)", "(B)", "(C)" etc. in the caption when sub-figures are used. The capital letters (A, B, C, etc.) are at the upper-left corner to sub-figures.
It is permissible to use an abbreviation for the axis description as long as it is a common abbreviation or identified in the caption. Units of measures, when needed, follow the axis description, separated by a comma.
• Make sure to use uniform lettering and sizing of your original artwork.
• Save text in illustrations as “graphics” or enclose the font.
• Only use the following fonts in your illustrations: Arial, Courier, Times, Symbol.
• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.
• Use a logical naming convention for your artwork files.
• Provide captions to illustrations separately.
• Produce images near to the desired size of the printed version.
A detailed guide on electronic artwork is available.
Authors are urged to visit this site; some excerpts from the detailed information are given here.
Regardless of the application used, when your electronic artwork is finalized, please “save as” or convert the images to one of the following formats (note the resolution requirements for line drawings, halftones, and line/halftone combinations given below):
EPS: Vector drawings. Embed the font or save the text as “graphics”
TIFF: color or grayscale photographs (halftones): always use a minimum of 300 dpi.
TIFF: Bitmapped line drawings: use a minimum of 1,000 dpi.
TIFF: Combinations bitmapped line/half-tone (color or grayscale): a minimum of 500 dpi is required.
If your electronic artwork is created in a Microsoft Office application (Word, PowerPoint, Excel) then please supply 'as is'.
Please do not:
• Supply files that are optimized for screen use (e.g., GIF, BMP, PICT, WPG); the resolution is too low;
• Supply files that are too low in resolution;
• Submit graphics that are disproportionately large for the content.
Please make sure that artwork files are in an acceptable format (TIFF or JPEG, EPS or PDF, or MS Office files) and with the correct resolution. If, together with your accepted article, authors submit usable color figures then Elsevier will ensure, at no additional charge, that these figures will appear in color on the Web (e.g., ScienceDirect and other sites) regardless of whether or not these illustrations are reproduced in color in the printed version.
Appendix and Supplementary Data
Appendix and supplementary data are optional. They may contain supplementary material, explanations, and elaborations that are not essential to other major sections but are helpful to the reader. They are not directly presented on the article but can be download via a link on the web page. The names should be as follows: Appendix Table 1, Appendix Table 2, etc., Appendix Fig. 1, Appendix Fig. 2, etc., or Table S1, Table S2, etc., Fig. S1, Fig. S2, etc., or Supplementary data for xxx, etc.
Units of Measure
Follow internationally accepted rules and conventions. Use the international system of units (SI) and SI derived units that are widely used in conjunction with SI units. The following site (National Institute of Standards and Technology) provides a comprehensive guide to SI units and usage: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/index.html
- Do not use ppm, which is not a SI unit. Replace ppm with mg/kg, μg/g, mg/L, μg/mL, μL/L, or nL/mL.
- Use metric ton or tonne, e.g., 32.8 g/metric ton, 13.6 g/tonne.
Centrifugal force should be provided in × g with the duration, temperature, and type of centrifugation, e.g., "centrifuged at 3,000 × g at 4 °C for 15 min". Centrifugation expression using "rpm" or "r/min" should be converted to centrifugal force, because g force depends on radius of the rotor and the speed of revolution.
Relative Centrifugal Force (RCF) = (rpm)2 × 1.118 × 10-5 × r, where r is the radius of the rotor.
The following websites give a list of conversions: http://www.endmemo.com/bio/grpm.php, https://bcf.technion.ac.il/portfolio/rcfrpm-conversion/.
- Use numerals rather than words to express whole and decimal numbers in scientific text, titles, headings, tables, and figure captions, e.g., 4 times, 6 groups, except when they begin a sentence.
- For most general uses, spell out zero and one. However, use numerals when they are directly connected to a unit of measure or when they specify assigned or calculated values, e.g., 1 year, a mean of 0.
- Use numerals to designate mathematical relationships, such as ratios and multiplication factors, e.g., 5:1, at 100× magnification, 3-fold.
- Use a comma in numbers greater than 999, e.g., 1,200.
- Numbers share a same unit of measure, e.g., 9.80, 9.55 and 9.71 MJ/kg.
- The percentage sign is not shared, e.g., 10% to 20%.
- Use "to" for a numeral range, e.g., from 2 to 10 d.
- Please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Present simple formulae in the line of text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small fractional terms, e.g., X/Y. Only one slash may be used in any give expression, e.g., (a/b)/c, not a/b/c.
- Display complex formulae separately from the text, and use MathType to enter complex formulae. If they are referred to explicitly in the text, number them consecutively.
- For an unabbreviated term that is long or complex, use of an abbreviation may be helpful. Where such a term is continually referred to, it must be written in full and followed by the subsequent abbreviation in parentheses. It should be consistently defined in the abstract, re-defined in the main text, and re-defined in tables and figures when it first appears; thereafter, the abbreviation is always used.
- Common and standard abbreviations (a list is provided in the General section) can be directly used without being defined, but the intended meaning must be unambiguous from the context.
- Chemical symbols and 3-letter abbreviations for amino acids can be directly used without definition.
- Single-letter abbreviations that could be confused with chemical elements (e.g., P, C, S, N) are not suggested to be used.
- Excessive use of abbreviations can confuse the reader. If an abbreviation is not used in the following text, it should not be used; the term it represents should be spell out, or the text in which it appears should be rewritten to eliminate the need for the abbreviation.
- Abbreviations are generally fully spelled in the beginning of sentences.
- Liter or Litre is always a capital letter "L", e.g. mL, dL.
- Use "Exp." For experiment and "Eq." for "equation", e.g., Exp. 1, Eq. 1.
- Use "s", "min", "h", "d" for second, minute and day, e.g., 2 h, 3 min, 20 s, 5 d, and d 9.
- P (probability) is always a capital letter P in italics, e.g., P-value.
- Plural abbreviations do not require "s."
- Only capitalize the first word and any proper nouns in the paper title, section headings, Table and Figure titles, Table column and row headings.
- Trademarked product names should be capitalized.
- Non-English words in common usage (as shown in https://dictionary.cambridge.org/, https://www.merriam-webster.com/) are not in italics, e.g., in vitro, in vivo, ad libitum, in situ, a priori, spp., vs., i.e., et al., etc.
- Italicize statistical letters, n for sample size, P for probability, R, etc.
- Represent variables by a single letter in italics in mathematical expressions, e.g., x, y.
- Italicize letters and numerals used as a symbol for a gene.
- Italicize bacteria names only at the genus and species levels.
- Write the full Latin names of bacteria genera, plants, and insects at the first mention in the abstract, and again in the main text such as Butyrivibrio fibrisolvensi, and thereafter in the short forms, such as B. fibrisolvensi.
Current standard international nomenclature for genes should be adhered to. Authors are required to use only approved gene and protein names and symbols. In general, full gene names should not be italicized and gene symbols should be in italics. A protein symbol should be in the same format as its gene except the protein symbol should not be in italics. For human genes, use genetic notation and symbols approved by the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (http://www.genenames.org/) or refer to PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/ entrez). The Human Genome Variation Society also has a useful site that provides guidance in naming mutations at http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/index.html
When any gene expression work is involved, the reference gene(s) used must be optimised according to the guideline The Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) (https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797).
- Registered (®) and trademark (©, ™) symbols should not be used, unless as part of an article title in the References section.
- In the main text, spaces should be added around all signs (except slant lines) of operation (=, −, +, ±, ×, ≥, >, ≤, or <) when these signs occur between 2 items.
- Avoid jargon unfamiliar to scientists from other disciplines. Do not use the term "head" to refer to an animal or group of animals. Instead, use "animal, sow, ewe, steer, heifer, cattle", etc.
Where a preprint has subsequently become available as a peer-reviewed publication, the formal publication should be used as the reference. If there are preprints that are central to your work or that cover crucial developments in the topic, but are not yet formally published, these may be referenced. Preprints should be clearly marked as such, for example by including the word preprint, or the name of the preprint server, as part of the reference. The preprint DOI should also be provided.
This journal encourages and enables authors to share data that supports their research publication where appropriate, and enables authors to interlink the data with their published articles. Research data refers to the results of observations or experimentation that validate research findings. To facilitate reproducibility and data reuse, this journal also encourages authors to share the software, code, models, algorithms, protocols, methods and other useful materials related to the project.
Below are a number of ways in which authors can associate data with their article or make a statement about the availability of their data when submitting the manuscript. If authors are sharing data in one of these ways, authors are encouraged to cite the data in the manuscript and reference list. Please refer to the 'References' section for more information about data citation. For more information on depositing, sharing and using research data and other relevant research materials, visit the research data page.
If authors have made their research data available in a data repository, authors can link their article directly to the dataset. Elsevier collaborates with a number of repositories to link articles on ScienceDirect with relevant repositories, giving readers access to underlying data that give them a better understanding of the research described.
There are different ways to link authors' datasets to authors' article. When available, authors can directly link their dataset to their article by providing the relevant information in the submission system. For more information, visit the database linking page.
For supported data repositories a repository banner will automatically appear next to the published article on ScienceDirect.
In addition, authors can link to relevant data or entities through identifiers within the text of their manuscript, using the following format: Database: xxxx (e.g., TAIR: AT1G01020; CCDC: 734053; PDB: 1XFN).
This journal supports Mendeley Data, enabling authors to deposit any research data (including raw and processed data, video, code, software, algorithms, protocols, and methods) associated with the manuscript in a free-to-use, open access repository. During the submission process, after uploading the manuscript, authors will have the opportunity to upload their relevant datasets directly to Mendeley Data. The datasets will be listed and directly accessible to readers next to their published article online.
For more information, visit the Mendeley Data for journals page.
To foster transparency, Animal Nutrition encourages authors to state the availability of the data in their submission. This may be a requirement of the funding body or institution. If the data is unavailable to access or unsuitable to post, authors will have the opportunity to indicate why during the submission process, for example by stating that the research data is confidential. The statement will appear with the published article on ScienceDirect. For more information, visit the Data Statement page.
Use of the Digital Object Identifier
The Digital Object Identifier (DOI) may be used to cite and link to electronic documents. The DOI consists of a unique alpha-numeric character string which is assigned to a document by the publisher upon the initial electronic publication. The assigned DOI never changes. Therefore, it is an ideal medium for citing a document, particularly 'Articles in press' because they have not yet received their full bibliographic information. The correct format for citing a DOI is shown as follows (example taken from a document in the journal Physics Letters B):https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.059
When authors use a DOI to create links to documents on the web, the DOIs are guaranteed never to change.
One set of page proofs (as PDF files) will be sent by e-mail to the corresponding author or a link will be provided in the e-mail so that authors can download the files themselves. To ensure a fast publication process of the article, Animal Nutrition kindly asks authors to provide us with their proof corrections within two days. Elsevier now provides authors with PDF proofs which can be annotated; for this authors will need to download the free Adobe Reader, version 9 (or higher). Instructions on how to annotate PDF files will accompany the proofs (also given online). The exact system requirements are given at the Adobe site.
If authors do not wish to use the PDF annotations function, authors may list the corrections (including replies to the Query Form) and return them to Elsevier in an e-mail. Please list the corrections quoting line number. If, for any reason, this is not possible, then mark the corrections and any other comments (including replies to the Query Form) on a printout of the proof and scan the pages and return via e-mail. Please use this proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and correctness of the text, tables and figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this stage with permission from the Editor. Animal Nutrition will do everything possible to get articles published quickly and accurately. It is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back to Animal Nutrition in one communication: please check carefully before replying, as inclusion of any subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely authors' responsibility.
The corresponding author will be notified and receive a link to the published version of the open access article on ScienceDirect. This link is in the form of an article DOI link which will be valid forever and can be shared via email and social networks. Both corresponding and co-authors may order offprints at any time via Elsevier's WebShop (https://webshop.elsevier.com/article-services/article-offprints/). Authors requiring printed copies of multiple articles may use Elsevier WebShop's 'Create Your Own Book' service to collate multiple articles within a single cover (https://webshop.elsevier.com/myarticleservices/booklets).